Skip to content

Eclipse Europa… Too Many Choices…

I was happy to see that Europa was released on-time this morning. However, I was very disappointed to see the confusing download page.

Here are your Java/JEE choices:

  • Eclipse IDE for Java Developers - 79 MB
  • Eclipse IDE for Java EE Developers - 123 MB
  • Eclipse Classic - 140 MB

So, I’m ok with there being a Java version and a JEE version considering all Java development isn’t in the JEE world, as some people think. But what makes me crazy is there being an Eclipse “Classic” version. WTF?!?

If Eclipse Classic wasn’t tailored to Java developers I might buy the need for it. The thing is… the Classic version IS for Java developers. So they have an Eclipse IDE for Java Developers and an Eclipse Classic which is for Java developers. How the people in the eclipse org don’t think this will confuse people is a question I’d like answered.

What’s funny is if you look at the Java IDE “info” page you will see them describe it as an IDE for Java developers, with a nice set of features for Java developers, an XML Editor, and the Mylyn plugin. Then you look at what they say about the Classic version. It’s a superior Java editing IDE as well as a platform for building RCP apps. This last point is what really makes me crazy! What I left off my list above is that there is also a pre-built version of Eclipse 3.3 for doing RCP development.

SO WHY THE FRIGGIN’ CLASSIC VERSION? I see it only confusing people and slowing the adoption of Eclipse.

Sorry for this rant. I must have had too much coffee this morning.

26 Comments

  1. pete wrote:

    nice. have another cup!

    Friday, June 29, 2007 at 9:15 am | Permalink
  2. Roman Strobl wrote:

    If there is a “classic” version, shouldn’t there be a “modern” version as well? :)

    Friday, June 29, 2007 at 9:21 am | Permalink
  3. erik wrote:

    Pete,

    I’ve switched to Diet Coke.

    Friday, June 29, 2007 at 9:50 am | Permalink
  4. erik wrote:

    Roman,

    Thanks for stopping by.

    The thing is, I bet the modern version would still be missing something. Or, even worse there would be a modern JEE version, and a modern RCP version.

    Friday, June 29, 2007 at 9:52 am | Permalink
  5. Reed wrote:

    I found your blog because I was also confused by the downloads page. I’m still trying to figure out if Classic contains everything in the Java Developers version (without having to download both to find out).

    Friday, June 29, 2007 at 12:43 pm | Permalink
  6. Ian Skerrett wrote:

    Erik

    I kind of agree that there are too many choices. However, when we re-designed the download page we got feedback that people still wanted to keep a link to the old standard download, hence Eclipse Classic.

    Reed,

    To answer your question, Classic does not contain Mylyn or an XML editor. If you use Eclipse as just a Java IDE, I would recommend using the Java Developer version.

    Friday, June 29, 2007 at 1:24 pm | Permalink
  7. erik wrote:

    Howdy Ian,

    Thx for stopping by and clearing things up. One thing I find odd is that the Classic version is 140 MB and the Java version is 79 MB. The Java version has Mylyn and an XML editor and is tremendously smaller in size then the classic version. Why is the Classic version so large? Is there something there I want to add to the Java version?

    Erik

    Friday, June 29, 2007 at 2:52 pm | Permalink
  8. erik wrote:

    Howdy Reed,

    Thx for stopping by and it looks like Ian was kind enought to give us some answers.

    Friday, June 29, 2007 at 2:53 pm | Permalink
  9. Ian Skerrett wrote:

    Erik,

    The Java Developer package does not contain source code or PDE.

    Here is a link to the detailed contents http://www.eclipse.org/epp/content.php.

    As a reminder, Classic is the same package as we had previous to Europa.

    btw, they is a bug in the Java EE package so we have pulled it down until it gets addressed. :-)

    Saturday, June 30, 2007 at 5:14 am | Permalink
  10. erik wrote:

    Ian,

    Thanks for further clarifing the differences between downloads, and for the link. The only thing missing from the link was what goes into the classic version.

    I keep hearing and seeing that it was the same as the previous versions, but I’m not sure what that means. It obviously means more then just a Java IDE.

    Erik

    Saturday, June 30, 2007 at 1:10 pm | Permalink
  11. Dean Fredericks wrote:

    I completly agree

    I too found this blog, because I did not understand what I needed to download?

    I thought it was a release of 21 projects together.. so it would all be in 1 download called europa. Oh well…. so now we have 3 choices, and no clear description of what u can and cannot do with each.

    The download pages doesn’t say what is in the choices, but lists “Additional Features” can be downloaded… Each download has a different list of features that can be downloaded - So does that mean some features can be downloaded on one distro, but not another?

    Ag… ridiculous… Im gonna download eclipse classic now…. lets see whats inside…

    Common on Eclipse…

    Monday, July 2, 2007 at 12:54 am | Permalink
  12. Donald Smith wrote:

    Very cool, thanks for the feedback — keep it coming!

    Dean, I can’t imagine what kind of attention-deficit-disorder a programmer would have to have in order to want all 21 various projects in the Europa release train, but I’d sure like to meet him/her :)

    - Don

    Monday, July 2, 2007 at 4:35 pm | Permalink
  13. Ian Skerrett wrote:

    Erik,

    Think Eclipse Classic = Eclipse Platform + JDT + PDE + All Source Code. I hope this helps. :-)

    Dean,

    Thanks for the feedback. We will try to improve the descriptions for each package. If you do want all 21 projects, I would suggest starting with Eclipse Classic or Eclipse for RCP Developer. Then use the update manager to download what you want. Putting all 21 projects into one download would have made it just too big.

    Monday, July 2, 2007 at 5:55 pm | Permalink
  14. erik wrote:

    Ian,

    Thanks a ton for clearing things up.

    Erik

    Monday, July 2, 2007 at 9:41 pm | Permalink
  15. Avery Regier wrote:

    It may be too big to have an all in one for normal downloads, but that is what BitTorrent is for.

    An all in one would greatly simplify the setup process, when all you really want is a way to get started quickly without having to be bothered with a bunch of secondary installs and updates and figuring your way through the update manager. My time is more valuable than that. Yes, the download may take a while, but again, that’s why we have BitTorrent.

    By not including Mylin and the XML editor in Classic, you just made the Classic install much less inviting and useful.

    Tuesday, July 3, 2007 at 8:30 am | Permalink
  16. erik wrote:

    Howdy Avery, Thanks for dropping by.

    I agree with you on the need for a true all-in-one. I wasted a full day downloading and building an Eclipse distro for my teams dev environment.

    Erik

    Tuesday, July 3, 2007 at 4:41 pm | Permalink
  17. Ian Skerrett wrote:

    I should have mentioned that if you want an Eclipse distro there are a number of organizations providing distros. Yoxos is probably the most comprehensive http://eclipsediscovery.yoxos.com/discovery/rap

    Thursday, July 5, 2007 at 5:34 am | Permalink
  18. mike wrote:

    I was previously using classic 3.1 for java development. I’m wondering if I switch to europa will it be seamless (importing existing projects) and will I be missing anything that I had in classic. Guess I will give it a go & let you know…

    Friday, July 13, 2007 at 9:32 am | Permalink
  19. mike wrote:

    Looks good. I was able to open my workspace from classic 3.1 no problem. And I already noticed a few nice bug fixes in 3.3. Thanks

    Friday, July 13, 2007 at 12:33 pm | Permalink
  20. Anna wrote:

    Hi, well i got the same problem when i tried to download eclipse!!!
    that’s why i stop by this blog…. i wonder which version is the best for J2ME apps development, actually i dont know….
    i think im gonna pick the classic one…

    Saturday, March 1, 2008 at 8:01 pm | Permalink
  21. fran wrote:

    Take a look

    i had the same issue until I saw this page.

    http://www.eclipse.org/downloads/moreinfo/compare.php

    Friday, June 13, 2008 at 9:07 pm | Permalink
  22. Erik Weibust wrote:

    Thanks Fran… I’m still confused why Eclipse needs an Eclipse version and a Classic version. WTH?

    Friday, June 13, 2008 at 9:34 pm | Permalink
  23. Ray wrote:

    I used to use eclipse, back when it was first introduced. Recently, when faced with the need to write some Java applications, I decided to explore it once again. The download page was incredibly daunting. So after reading this article:
    http://www.devx.com/Java/Article/34009/0/page/1
    I decided just to download netbeans from the sun website. Now, I appreciate netbeans, and will only download eclipse if I’m forced to use it (by an employer). It seems superior to eclipse (the old one that I was used to, but according to the article above, much is unchanged) in several ways and much more intuitive.

    Friday, January 23, 2009 at 4:26 pm | Permalink
  24. Michael Schultz wrote:

    What is the difference between Java EE and Jave?

    I want to build a website with Google App Engine.

    Which download is applicable?

    Saturday, July 25, 2009 at 1:28 am | Permalink
  25. Erik Weibust wrote:

    Howdy Michael,

    Thanks for stopping by. Your question can be answered in one sentence or with volumes of books.

    Java (SE) is the standard edition of Java. It can be used for all kinds of programming tasks. It is also the core, basis for Java EE. Java EE is the web application framework you would use to develop web applications.

    Check out Sun’s robust tutorial site.
    http://java.sun.com/developer/onlineTraining/

    Erik

    Saturday, July 25, 2009 at 10:10 am | Permalink
  26. crantok wrote:

    Ha! Two and a half years after you post this and I stumble across it because I’m similarly confused. (I’ve never programmed in Java but want to give Groovy a go and it’s not supported by my favourite editor, Geany.)

    I blame the Eclipse website. It’s so visually busy that I didn’t even try to figure anything out there. I googled
    difference “eclipse classic” “eclipse ide for java developers”
    and this page is the second link. The first link is the page that confused me.

    Sunday, December 27, 2009 at 7:19 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word