Skip to content

Eclipse Hates SVN…

Yup, I said it…  Eclipse hates SVN.  The way I see it, Eclipse treats Subversion like a red-headed stepchild.  How long has Subversion been around now?  Years and years, since 2000 to be exact.  Yeah, it’s been around for 8 years.  And Eclipse still only does a half-ass job of supporting subverion.  The Eclipse Foundation choose Subversive as their svn client/plugin of choice back in Nov 2007.  Yet, to get Subversive up and running in Eclipse is a matter of pain and suffering.

Eclipse just released their yearly version, this year they’re calling it Ganymede, and it was supposed to kind of have svn/Subversive support….  but heck no.  Good luck getting it working.  The documentation/instructions suck at best, being fair, the instuctions are crap.

Oh, I’m so close to giving NetBeans a serious look.

8 Comments

  1. We use Eclipse/SVN at work. It’s a pain, it crashes sometime with big commits (how can it, a SCM I trust my sources with) or doesn’t see changes. Really bad. Privatly I have been using IDEA for years without any SVN problems.

    Peace
    -stephan

    PS: How can a SCM(-client) dare to crash?

    Thursday, August 14, 2008 at 9:14 pm | Permalink
  2. Tim wrote:

    I second the IntelliJ IDEA suggestion. Works great and stays out of your way. A true coder’s editor, not an IDE. And you even have a free license to it!

    -Tim

    Friday, August 15, 2008 at 7:03 am | Permalink
  3. Rob Davies wrote:

    I used to struggle with SVN on eclipse but not since using the pure Java interface option - preferences->team->SVN.

    Have you tried that ?

    cheers,

    Rob

    Friday, August 15, 2008 at 9:28 am | Permalink
  4. Erik Weibust wrote:

    @Stephan
    @Tim
    IntelliJ is not an option. I need a FOSS IDE which leaves Eclipse and Netbeans.

    @Rob
    Can you please clarify how to get to the pure Java option? I didn’t see anything on Prefs -> Team -> SVN that looked like a pure java option.

    Friday, August 15, 2008 at 11:14 am | Permalink
  5. Frans Thamura wrote:

    agreee

    i use eclipse since 2.0, and now there is 3.4 that cannot run subclipse easily.

    i dont know why eclipse people change the spec of their plugins, that is bad…

    hurting community.

    Friday, August 15, 2008 at 7:09 pm | Permalink
  6. Geoffrey Wiseman wrote:

    Huh. I occasionally have issues with Eclipse/subversive, but I don’t find it too troublesome for the most part. I’d prefer it to be stronger, but it’s good enough that I don’t bother with the command-line for the most part.

    But, then, if you think you’re going to have a better time with NB, I encourage you to try. I looked at NB about a year back and one of the things that quickly drove me back to Eclipse was the support for SVN in NB — the interface was ugly and incredibly limiting.

    Saturday, August 16, 2008 at 4:57 am | Permalink
  7. Rob wrote:

    Have you tried subclipse, Use it with subversion and eclipse everyday and I am quite please with it.

    Saturday, August 23, 2008 at 5:49 pm | Permalink
  8. Erik Weibust wrote:

    Hmm… Rob, we had a few problems with Subclipse and decided to move to Subversive, since Eclipse picked it as the standard. I think as soon as the Eclipse people get Subversive fully integrated this won’t be an issue.

    Monday, August 25, 2008 at 1:41 pm | Permalink

Post a Comment

Your email is never published nor shared. Required fields are marked *
*
*

*
To prove you're a person (not a spam script), type the security word shown in the picture. Click on the picture to hear an audio file of the word.
Click to hear an audio file of the anti-spam word